Saturday, April 30, 2011

Lifetime Portable Basketball Goal product comparison


!9# Lifetime Portable Basketball Goal product comparison

[if ]
[endif]

Lifetime Basketball Goals Portable Model 71 522, 71 523, 71 524 and

These portable basketball hoop models give buyers a headache if the list of products is not very thorough. Apparently all look the same: 54 inches of rear wall, portable base, 3.5-inch round rod. But there are several factors that make these products very different. This article is to elaborate on some of these differences.

54-Inch backboard

All these products are characterized byboard size larger life on portable baskets. The characters of 54 inches makes the cards after just 18 inches wide regulation. So is a difference between these systems is important when the purchasing decision. For the 71 523 and 71 524, polycarbonate rear wall. At 71 522 is the back wall of acrylic. For most of the players of the difference in gameplay between acrylic and polycarbonate is quite low. What is shown inCustomer and supplier of basketball is that acrylic offers superior bounce when the ball hits the back wall. For most beginners to advanced players, this difference is almost imperceptible. For experienced players, is likely to first notice that a polycarbonate material bank board gave their shots a bit '. On the other hand, polycarbonate is used as it is believed to be about 30 times stronger than acrylic, which is the life of yourSystem. We expect the board to break the night with an acrylic, but polycarbonate is more where the last two years and similar systems used.

Billboard Frame

In these 3 portable baskets, the thickness of the frame is an essential difference. large for the 71 522 and 71 523, the steel frame measuring 1.5 inches on the table. At 71 524, the frame measures just 1 inch wide. For portable baskets, as this is the bouncegreatly improved with a thicker structure. So relax with respect to which, 71 522 (with its rear wall and frame acrylic 1.5-inch) have the best bounce and 71,524 (with its rear wall and frame in polycarbonate 1 inch), will worse rebound. Comparing these two factors, the material of the rear wall and the thickness of the frame, the frame thickness has a major role in improving the rebound.

Prices

explained by these differences, one might expect the 71 522expensive, but this is not the case. On most commercial sites, it is more expensive than the 71 523 71 522 and 71 524 is the cheapest. The main reason for this difference is the difference in production costs. Polycarbonate is often more expensive materials and methods of production of acrylic. As mentioned above, there are many differences in terms of quality, some of which poisons pick-your-own. This means that during 71 522 71 523 less than the posterior wall of the acrylic71 522 is not able to last as long as the polycarbonate 71523rd on board the 71 523, we would expect not to see a rebound and 71 522, but you will pay more for 71523rd

We hope that the description of the differences in these three systems will not be high. Have fun.


Lifetime Portable Basketball Goal product comparison

!9# Lyrics Everlasting God Decide Now




0 comments:

Post a Comment


Twitter Facebook Flickr RSS



Français Deutsch Italiano Português
Español 日本語 한국의 中国简体。







Sponsor Links